<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sonian Hosted Archiving Services &#187; Legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sonian.com/category/blog/legal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sonian.com</link>
	<description>Hosted Email Archiving Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:37:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Compliance Requirements for Email Archiving</title>
		<link>http://www.sonian.com/2009/10/compliance-requirements-for-email-archiving/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sonian.com/2009/10/compliance-requirements-for-email-archiving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance & Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DASD 3010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarbanes Oxley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC 17A-4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC Invesment Advisers Act 1940]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonian.net/?p=872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEC 17A-4 and NASD 3010 The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) originally enacted the Securities Exchange Act in 1934, as a means of protecting investors from fraudulent or misleading claims by securities dealers. The Act required member firms to create and maintain transaction records which could be reviewed and audited. In 1997, rule 17a-4 of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="SOX Compliance" src="http://zone.artizans.com/images/previews/DBRO664.300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></p>
<h2>SEC 17A-4 and NASD 3010</h2>
<p>The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) originally enacted the Securities Exchange Act in 1934, as a means of  protecting investors from fraudulent or misleading claims by securities dealers. The Act required member firms to <a href="http://www.sonian.net/solutions/discovery-compliance/">create and maintain transaction records</a> which could be reviewed and audited. In 1997, rule 17a-4 of the Act was amended to provide procedures for storage of electronic records, including emails.</p>
<p>This rule has since been interpreted to include instant messages as well. NASD (National Association of Securities Dealers) applies similar  rules to its member firms through NASD 3010. The provisions of SEC 17a-4 and NASD 3010 apply to all individuals  and organizations involved in trading securities. This includes securities firms, stock brokerage firms, banks and any  financial institutions that fall under SEC or NASD jurisdiction. They require securities dealers to implement specific,  enforceable retention procedures, which include the following:</p>
<p>• Archived messages must be stored in duplicate. One copy must be stored in an online archive, and a second copy  must be stored offline on permanent, tamperproof media, such as <a title="Archiving" href="http://www.sonian.net/solutions/">Write-Once-Read-Many (WORM)</a> technology.</p>
<p>• Storage media must be verified automatically for quality and accuracy.</p>
<p>• Archived messages must be date/time-stamped and serialized. Each message must be assigned a unique,  sequential identification number as a safeguard against deletion.</p>
<p>• A searchable index of all stored data must be maintained. Indexes must be retained on each unit of storage media  for the messages and attachments stored on that unit.</p>
<p>• Messages and indexes must be easily retrievable and downloadable to other media as required by SEC regulators.</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<h2><strong> SEC Investment Advisers Act of 1940</strong></h2>
<p>The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently imposed new regulations on private investment pools,  also known as hedge funds. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, in a three-to-two vote on Oct. 26, 2005  decided to require hedge fund managers with assets in excess of $25 million to register under the Investment Advisors Act  of 1940. The regulation went into effect on Feb. 1, 2006.The ruling requires that most hedge fund advisers register with the  SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, which includes provisions for securing, managing and archiving all<br />
electronic communication, including email and instant messages.</p>
<p>• Archived messages must be stored in duplicate. One copy must be stored in an online archive, and a second copy must  be stored offline on permanent, tamper-proof media, such as Write-Once-Read-Many (WORM) technology.</p>
<p>• Storage media must be verified automatically for quality and accuracy.</p>
<p>• Archived messages must be date/time-stamped and serialized. Each message must be assigned a unique, sequential  identification number as a safeguard against deletion.</p>
<p>• A searchable index of all stored data must be maintained. Indexes must be retained on each unit of storage media for the messages and attachments stored on that unit.</p>
<p>Messages and indexes must be easily retrievable and downloadable to other media as required by SEC regulators.</p>
<h2><strong>Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX)</strong></h2>
<p>The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was enacted in the wake of several major corporate and accounting scandals. Its  provisions affect <a title="SOX Regulations" href="http://www.sonian.net/solutions/industry/regulations/#4">email retention, integrity and oversight</a>. Sarbanes-Oxley applies to all publicly traded companies and the CPA&#8217;s and attorneys associated with these companies.</p>
<p>• Section 802 presents a possible fine of up to $1,000,000 dollars or a prison sentence of up to 20 years for any person who  destroys, alters, mutilates or conceals any electronic document in an official investigation.</p>
<p>• Sarbanes-Oxley specifies minimum retention periods for all accounting records, work papers, communications, file  attachments, and documents whether transmitted via email, instant messaging or other message modes.</p>
<p>• Section 302 requires CFO&#8217;s and CEO&#8217;s to personally certify and be accountable for their firms record retention policies and financial reports.</p>
<p>• Section 404 requires auditors to certify the underlying controls and processes that are used to compile the financial results of a company. Email is a critical component in being able to achieve this certification.</p>
<p>• Section 103(a) and 801(a) require companies to maintain all documents including electronic documents that form the basis of an audit or review for seven years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sonian.com/2009/10/compliance-requirements-for-email-archiving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cloud-powered Email Archiving is Perfect Neutral Repository</title>
		<link>http://www.sonian.com/2009/09/cloud-powered-email-archiving-is-perfect-neutral-repository/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sonian.com/2009/09/cloud-powered-email-archiving-is-perfect-neutral-repository/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Arnette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance & Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ediscover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonian.net/?p=698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The City of Boston's Mayor's office is embroiled in controversy for not preserving email records for a key adviser to the Mayor. The specific details are still being uncovered, and storage forensic experts have been retained to  try to recover deleted messages from workstations and servers. If the backup tapes exist some of the data will be recovered, but at huge expense.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-699 alignleft" title="Hosted Email Archiving Boston" src="http://www.sonian.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/boston-city-hall-150x150.png" alt="boston-city-hall" width="150" height="150" /> The City of Boston&#8217;s Mayor&#8217;s office is embroiled in controversy for not preserving email records for a key adviser to the Mayor. The specific details are still being uncovered, and storage forensic experts have been retained to  try to recover deleted messages from workstations and servers. If the backup tapes exist some of the data will be recovered, but at huge expense.</p>
<p>As we wait for the investigation to report the facts, what we do know is that the tax payer will bear the expense burden for forensic experts, and the City of Boston&#8217;s existing $1 million dollar outlay  for archiving and <a title="eDiscovery" href="http://www.sonian.net/solutions/discovery-compliance/">e-discovery</a> last year did not adequately preserve all the data.</p>
<p>On-premise expensive software and hardware based archives are less secure and more susceptible to tampering than cloud-based archives. The right <a title="Cloud Powered Solutions" href="http://www.sonian.net/solutions/">cloud-based solution</a> can be more secure than on-premise, reducing data touch points, one set of secure access credentials, and always allowing fast immediate access to all the stored data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sonian.com/2009/09/cloud-powered-email-archiving-is-perfect-neutral-repository/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sorry Judge, It had no &quot;Administrative Value&quot; to ME</title>
		<link>http://www.sonian.com/2008/05/sorry-judge-it-had-no-administrative-value-to-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sonian.com/2008/05/sorry-judge-it-had-no-administrative-value-to-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pzimmerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance & Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.sonian.net/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Throughout the United States, state and local governments are reassessing and restating (hopefully) their email archiving and retention policies due to the recent lawsuit filed by the North Carolina Press Association and several other news agencies against Governor Mike Easley and the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, the state agency in charge of record [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/__ebT1CUNxk8/SDXeHv-2RyI/AAAAAAAAAAY/WcbZYPVbrtM/s1600-h/2261856936_fbf798beee.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/__ebT1CUNxk8/SDXeHv-2RyI/AAAAAAAAAAY/WcbZYPVbrtM/s200/2261856936_fbf798beee.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5203309169216997154" border="0" /></a><span style="font-family:arial;">Throughout the United States, state and local governments are reassessing and restating (hopefully) their email archiving and retention policies due to the recent lawsuit filed by the North Carolina Press Association and several other news agencies </span><span class="story"><span style="font-family:arial;">against Governor Mike Easley and the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, the state agency in charge of record retention.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:arial;">The lawsuit alleges the destruction of email records sent to and from the Governor&#8217;s office in what appears to be a blatant disregard for the State&#8217;s Open Records laws.  As more is learned of the policies set forth by the Department of Cultural Resources a new excuse maybe developing for law breakers and cheating spouses around the country&#8230;&#8221;it had no administrative value&#8221;.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-style: italic;font-family:arial;" >&#8220;Officer, I robbed that bank because I thought the money had no &#8216;administrative value&#8217; to the bank any more.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-style: italic;font-family:arial;" >&#8220;Honey, pay no attention to the lipstick on my collar, it has no &#8216;administrative value&#8217; to you.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:arial;">All joking aside, governments will need to modify their vague &#8216;administrative value&#8217; email retention and archiving policies.  Perhaps they can look to businesses in highly regulated fields like finance and energy who have been actively archiving emails at the enterprise level for many years.  These organizations have had an easier to remember (and much less arbitrary) policy that also goes by two words: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Keep everything!</span></span><br /></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sonian.com/2008/05/sorry-judge-it-had-no-administrative-value-to-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SaaS E-Discovery Brings Equality to Big and Small Firms</title>
		<link>http://www.sonian.com/2008/01/saas-e-discovery-brings-equality-to-big-and-small-firms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sonian.com/2008/01/saas-e-discovery-brings-equality-to-big-and-small-firms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Arnette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hosted Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.sonian.net/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brett Burney recently wrote a column SaaSsy Litigation Support for Law.com in which he discusses the pros and cons for using a hosted platform to manage e-discovery data. Brett accurately reports the major resistance to a SaaS e-discovery platform is the loss of control. But the benefits of SaaS, some of which are quoted from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett Burney recently wrote a column <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1197367480770">SaaSsy Litigation Support</a> for Law.com in which he discusses the pros and cons for using a hosted platform to manage e-discovery data. Brett accurately reports the major resistance to a SaaS e-discovery platform is the loss of control. But the benefits of SaaS, some of which are quoted from the article below, allow smaller firms to benefit from technology that only big firms used to be able to afford.
</p>
<blockquote><p>[...] On the other hand, a SaaS litigation review platform makes a lot of sense. Two issues that a litigation law firm&#8217;s IT department wrestles with constantly are 1) providing enough storage space for litigation databases, and 2) keeping the software up-to-date while it&#8217;s being used 24/7. </p>
<p>Those two obstacles fade away when a SaaS vendor is retained to shoulder those administrative burdens. The law firm&#8217;s IT department is then free to focus on other pertinent network administrative duties.</p>
<p>Paying a monthly fee for a SaaS review tool is certainly a less expensive alternative for smaller firms that may not want to hire another IT professional. In addition, the small firm wouldn&#8217;t have to pay for software, storage and server hardware to run the system internally.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sonian.com/2008/01/saas-e-discovery-brings-equality-to-big-and-small-firms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
